|
![]() |
June 17 2008
The Benefits of Smoking June 11 2008 Children and Passive Smoking June 05 2008 Brightly colored cigarettes packs are going to be banned May 29 2008 Online tobacco stores give smokers a lot of advantages April 24 2008 Flavored cigarettes could tempt children into smoking April 22 2008 Smoking Hookah is not a risk-free activity April 16 2008 Olympiad re-faces the most smoking nation |
Tobacco Advertising Has a Disturbing Effect on Children
By Nicolle Charbonneau
In the battle between cigarette advertising and anti-smoking campaigns, it looks
like kids are losing.
Smoking: Risk, Perception and Policy, a book just released by the Annenberg Public Policy Center from its Washington,
D.C., offices suggests that young people still associate smoking with popularity and relaxation, despite the messages about the
health risks of tobacco that are carried in anti-smoking ads.
Dan Romer, the research director at the Institute for Adolescent Risk Communication in Philadelphia, says that the research began after the $246 billion settlement that the tobacco industry signed in 1998 to end a rash of health-related lawsuits. Romer says the tobacco companies had argued that they shouldn't be held liable because anti-smoking ads meant smokers knew the risks when they started. "We thought that that claim was a little too strong and needed to be investigated," he says, especially in young people. In late 1999 and early 2000, Romer and his colleagues interviewed approximately 2,600 people between the ages of 14 and 22 and 1,500 people who were 23 and older. Romer, who noted that most smokers start before they are 20, found that tobacco ads had a disturbing effect among adolescents. Almost 90 percent of the 18-year-olds could recall seeing a recent tobacco ad, compared to only half of those who were 50. "[Adolescents] get a lot of very favorable imagery -- mainly through magazines and in stores -- that makes it look as though smoking is relaxing, fun and makes you popular," says Romer. That positive imagery is what drives kids to try cigarettes, he adds. "The advertising lays the groundwork." Anti-smoking campaigns, meanwhile, tend to provide information about the risks of smoking at an intellectual level, rather than an emotional one, he says. "Young people can tell you that it causes lung cancer, but they're not understanding that at a level that will stop them from [starting] smoking," Romer says. And although 80 percent of the smokers interviewed said they thought smoking was addictive, 60 percent thought quitting was "very easy or possible for most people, if they really try." "The messages that we give people about quitting tend to be optimistic [because they target adult smokers]," says Romer, but when that filters down to kids, the message becomes that quitting is a snap. "We believe the best way to address the problem of youth smoking is through more comprehensive efforts that give kids the tools they need to make the right decisions," he says. Romer also says that some states, like Massachusetts and California, are trying to counter the positive imagery shown in tobacco advertising through their anti-smoking messages. Nationally, a campaign by the American Legacy Foundation suggests that tobacco companies manipulate young people into wanting to smoke. But they face a powerful marketing adversary. In 1999, the five largest tobacco companies spent $8.24 billion on advertising &$150; up 22 percent from their budget at the time of the 1998 settlement. |
|
|
|