Warning: wordwrap() [function.wordwrap]: Break string cannot be empty in /home/uscigsco/public_html/.articles/index.php on line 72
Tobacco Advertising Has a Disturbing Effect on Children
  Home  
  News  
  Partners  
  FAQ  
  Contact Us  
  Add to favorites!  
Smoking Cigarette
 

Tobacco Advertising Has a Disturbing Effect on Children

By Nicolle Charbonneau
In the battle between cigarette advertising and anti-smoking campaigns, it looks like kids are losing. Smoking: Risk, Perception and Policy, a book just released by the Annenberg Public Policy Center from its Washington, D.C., offices suggests that young people still associate smoking with popularity and relaxation, despite the messages about the health risks of tobacco that are carried in anti-smoking ads.



Dan Romer, the research director at the Institute for Adolescent Risk Communication in Philadelphia, says that the research
began after the $246 billion settlement that the tobacco industry signed in 1998 to end a rash of health-related lawsuits.

Romer says the tobacco companies had argued that they shouldn't be held liable because anti-smoking ads meant smokers
knew the risks when they started. "We thought that that claim was a little too strong and needed to be investigated," he says,
especially in young people.

In late 1999 and early 2000, Romer and his colleagues interviewed approximately 2,600 people between the ages of 14 and 22
and 1,500 people who were 23 and older.

Romer, who noted that most smokers start before they are 20, found that tobacco ads had a disturbing effect among
adolescents. Almost 90 percent of the 18-year-olds could recall seeing a recent tobacco ad, compared to only half of those
who were 50.

"[Adolescents] get a lot of very favorable imagery -- mainly through magazines and in stores -- that makes it look as though
smoking is relaxing, fun and makes you popular," says Romer. That positive imagery is what drives kids to try cigarettes, he
adds. "The advertising lays the groundwork."

Anti-smoking campaigns, meanwhile, tend to provide information about the risks of smoking at an intellectual level, rather than
an emotional one, he says. "Young people can tell you that it causes lung cancer, but they're not understanding that at a level that
will stop them from [starting] smoking," Romer says.

And although 80 percent of the smokers interviewed said they thought smoking was addictive, 60 percent thought quitting was
"very easy or possible for most people, if they really try."

"The messages that we give people about quitting tend to be optimistic [because they target adult smokers]," says Romer, but
when that filters down to kids, the message becomes that quitting is a snap.

"We believe the best way to address the problem of youth smoking is through more comprehensive efforts that give kids the
tools they need to make the right decisions," he says.

Romer also says that some states, like Massachusetts and California, are trying to counter the positive imagery shown in
tobacco advertising through their anti-smoking messages. Nationally, a campaign by the American Legacy Foundation suggests
that tobacco companies manipulate young people into wanting to smoke.

But they face a powerful marketing adversary. In 1999, the five largest tobacco companies spent $8.24 billion on advertising
&$150; up 22 percent from their budget at the time of the 1998 settlement.