|
![]() |
June 17 2008
The Benefits of Smoking June 11 2008 Children and Passive Smoking June 05 2008 Brightly colored cigarettes packs are going to be banned May 29 2008 Online tobacco stores give smokers a lot of advantages April 24 2008 Flavored cigarettes could tempt children into smoking April 22 2008 Smoking Hookah is not a risk-free activity April 16 2008 Olympiad re-faces the most smoking nation |
Senate Committee to Hold Hearing on Smoking in Movies
By WENDY MELILLO
It's hard to imagine Casablanca's Rick Blaine without smoke swirling around his face as he grows increasingly morose. But anti-smoking activists argue that 60-plus years after that classic movie was made—long before the Surgeon General issued a warning on the dangers of tobacco—it's time for movies to lose the smoke.
Tomorrow, the issue of whether Hollywood glamorizes smoking, and thus encourages teens to adopt the habit, will be the subject of a Senate Commerce Committee hearing called by Sen. John Ensign, R-Nev. "Children are being influenced by the presence of smoking in movies," argued Ensign's rep, Jack Finn.
Ensign is not alone in his mission. William Sorrell, incoming president of the National Association of Attorneys General, told a group of advertisers and agency reps at an April meeting in Washington that, "We are seeing an increase in tobacco product placement in movies." Under the terms of the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement with 46 states, the tobacco industry agreed to refrain from product placement in movies and TV shows. The attorneys general and the American Legacy Association, however, point to recent Dartmouth Medical School studies that found cigarette brands are making more appearances in films and that teenagers who see smoking in movies are more likely to start smoking. For example, one study noted that Marlboro cigarettes appear in such teen-appeal movies as My Best Friend's Wedding, Men in Black and Volcano. A group of 25 attorneys general have been pressing the Motion Picture Association of America, the National Association of Theatre Owners and the various guilds representing directors, writers and actors to reduce the depiction of smoking in movies [Adweek, May 3]. In addition, the American Legacy Foundation, which sponsors a national anti-smoking campaign, along with the American Medical Association and the World Health Organization want Hollywood to adopt four principles: give all movies that depict smoking an "R" rating, stop identifying tobacco brands in films, run anti-smoking spots before movies that show smoking (to be sponsored by the movie distributor) and certify that producers of films that show smoking have not accepted anything of value from tobacco companies. In a letter sent to MPAA president Jack Valenti last August, Sorrell wrote, "The motion picture industry ... is uniquely situated to bring about sweeping change to prevent youth smoking." Legacy president and CEO Cheryl Healton said, "If you use the F word in a movie twice, the film has to be rated 'R.' I would argue that it is much less harmful to hear the F word twice than to see smoking glamorized." Vans Stevenson, svp for state legislative affairs at the MPAA, countered that depicting smoking is a matter of creative expression. "Our member companies are not in the business of advertising," he said. "We are in the business of storytelling. Therefore, smoking is an element in the time-honored tradition of art imitating life." |
|
|
|